I am indeed bewildered by the shrill and loud cries demanding rights for homosexuals and perplexed to find sane and logical persons defending these cries equally vigorously! I always thought that homosexuality was the result of treating sex as a taboo and tightly controlling all access to members of the opposite sex. It is indeed perplexing to find it flourishing in today's world that is liberal to the extent of being licentious.
It is all too easy to see the beautifully designed (evolved for Darwinists) algorithm of procreational sex. Features of female anatomy that males find most attractive are precisely those that facilitate conception, delivery and nurturing of a baby. Though modern society severely discourages body odors and encourages supplanting them with manufactured ones, research shows that body scent too is a mechanism to help sniff out the person whose gene-set compliments yours. The whole algorithm underlying human sexuality is geared to help conception, delivery and survival of best possible offspring. Though, to be sure, these algorithms are impeded by societal controls and sometimes even the institution of marriage. Now that both the impediments are weakening, the sexual activity seems to be going wayward instead of correcting course.
It is difficult to fathom where has the nature's algorithm gone wrong. Could it be a deviant preoccupation with recreational sex to the exclusion of procreational? Is it a phenomenon similar to addiction to junk food to the exclusion of the healthy ones? I wouldn't know. What is obvious is that nature never meant it to be this way and homo in homo sapiens does not stand for homosexuality.
Asking for such relationships to be granted legal recognition is like an insistence that doctors classify junk food as healthy and narcotics as normal drugs. And the demand by same sex couples for adoption of children must positively be denied. You just cannot condemn a child to such upbringing.
The only concession that can probably be granted is to not to persecute consenting adults for homosexuality. Though it will help if they could be persuaded to undergo the course that is sure to cure them according to Baba Ramdev. Of course this means that we insist on treating it as an abnormality. This also means that politicians stop pandering to this new found vote bank and journalists stop propagating it as elitist and fashionable.
It is all too easy to see the beautifully designed (evolved for Darwinists) algorithm of procreational sex. Features of female anatomy that males find most attractive are precisely those that facilitate conception, delivery and nurturing of a baby. Though modern society severely discourages body odors and encourages supplanting them with manufactured ones, research shows that body scent too is a mechanism to help sniff out the person whose gene-set compliments yours. The whole algorithm underlying human sexuality is geared to help conception, delivery and survival of best possible offspring. Though, to be sure, these algorithms are impeded by societal controls and sometimes even the institution of marriage. Now that both the impediments are weakening, the sexual activity seems to be going wayward instead of correcting course.
It is difficult to fathom where has the nature's algorithm gone wrong. Could it be a deviant preoccupation with recreational sex to the exclusion of procreational? Is it a phenomenon similar to addiction to junk food to the exclusion of the healthy ones? I wouldn't know. What is obvious is that nature never meant it to be this way and homo in homo sapiens does not stand for homosexuality.
Asking for such relationships to be granted legal recognition is like an insistence that doctors classify junk food as healthy and narcotics as normal drugs. And the demand by same sex couples for adoption of children must positively be denied. You just cannot condemn a child to such upbringing.
The only concession that can probably be granted is to not to persecute consenting adults for homosexuality. Though it will help if they could be persuaded to undergo the course that is sure to cure them according to Baba Ramdev. Of course this means that we insist on treating it as an abnormality. This also means that politicians stop pandering to this new found vote bank and journalists stop propagating it as elitist and fashionable.
